Often when you are dealing with major fraud allegations such as financial conspiracy the evidence may prove a core part of the allegations but it may not prove all of the allegations. For instance it may prove charges during a certain time period but not another time period. Experience has taught me that juries need prove beyond a reasonable doubt for all the charges. They do not not extend the proof for some over all. This is extremely important as anything that reduces the total seriousness of the charges makes a huge difference in relation to the sentenced handed down.
Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.4
Comments
Post a Comment